Updated: August 28, 2026
Legally Reviewed by Alan Pearse
DUI 2nd Offence in Saskatchewan
A 2nd DUI offence charge can threaten your freedom, licence, and livelihood before you have even reviewed the Crown’s evidence. It may result in mandatory jail, a lengthy driving prohibition, vehicle impoundment, requirements imposed by Saskatchewan Government Insurance (SGI), and another criminal record.
For someone who relies on driving to work in Saskatoon or commuting from Warman or Martensville, the disruption can begin long before the case reaches trial. But a prior conviction does not prove the new charge. The Crown must still prove the current allegation and properly establish the earlier conviction before the increased penalties can apply.
Alan Pearse focuses his practice exclusively on impaired driving litigation and represents clients throughout Saskatchewan. Since 2000, he has defended thousands of people and can examine traffic stops, testing demands, police procedures, Charter issues, and prior records before deciding how to respond.
What Are the Criminal Penalties for a Second Impaired Driving Conviction?
A second impaired driving conviction carries penalties imposed under the federal Criminal Code. The sentence may include:
- At least 30 days in jail. The Criminal Code sets a mandatory minimum jail sentence of 30 days for a second impaired driving. A judge can impose a longer sentence based on the circumstances.
- A driving prohibition of 2 to 10 years. The court will prohibit you from driving for at least two years and up to 10 years. The time spent in jail is added to the prohibition period.
- Higher maximum sentences. If the Crown proceeds by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is two years less a day in jail, a fine of up to $5,000, or both. If the Crown proceeds by indictment, the maximum jail sentence is 10 years.
- A delay before entering an ignition interlock program. For a second offence, federal law prevents entry into an ignition interlock program for at least three months after sentencing.
These are minimum and maximum ranges. The actual sentence can be affected by a collision, a high blood alcohol concentration, or another aggravating circumstance.
What Saskatchewan Penalties Apply to a Second Impaired Driving Offence?
Saskatchewan Government Insurance imposes separate provincial consequences. Some begin as soon as you are charged, while others apply after a conviction.
- An indefinite licence suspension. SGI suspends your licence when you are charged with a Criminal Code impaired driving offence. The suspension generally continues until the charge is resolved in court.
- Vehicle impoundment. The vehicle is normally impounded for 30 days. The impoundment increases to 60 days for an alleged blood alcohol concentration of .16 or higher.
- A three-year provincial driving disqualification. A second conviction results in a three-year driving disqualification in Saskatchewan. You must serve the longer of this provincial period or the prohibition imposed by the criminal court.
- Alcohol and drug education. A second conviction within 10 years generally requires completion of SGI’s Alcohol and Drug Education program before full driving privileges can be restored.
- A financial penalty. SGI lists a $1,250 penalty for an offence involving a blood alcohol concentration from .08 to .159 or a drug concentration over the legal limit. The penalty is $2,250 for a blood alcohol concentration of .16 or higher.
- Mandatory ignition interlock. An ignition interlock licence is generally required after an alcohol-related impaired driving conviction. The device must remain installed for the required period.
The Saskatchewan consequences operate separately from the criminal sentence, meaning a second conviction can result in overlapping court and SGI restrictions.
Can a Second Impaired Driving Charge Be Defended?
Yes. The earlier conviction may increase the potential sentence, but it does not prove the new allegation.
An attorney can help you examine:
- The stop and detention. Mandatory alcohol screening must still be based on a lawful traffic stop. Drug investigations require the legal grounds applicable to the demand made.
- The testing demands. Police must use the correct authority, communicate the demand clearly, and follow the required procedure.
- The breath or drug evidence. Timing, instrument records, officer procedure, blood collection, continuity, and laboratory analysis may affect reliability.
- The right to counsel. Once the right applies, police must inform you of it and provide a reasonable opportunity to contact a lawyer.
A defence is built by identifying what the Crown can prove with admissible evidence. Police notes, video, testing documents, timestamps, and laboratory records may show that an essential part of the prosecution’s case is missing, unreliable, or affected by a Charter breach.
Should You Plead Guilty Because You Have a Prior Conviction?
No. A prior conviction changes the sentencing risk, but the Crown still bears the burden of proving the present charge beyond a reasonable doubt.
A plea should follow a review of the disclosure, possible defences, the prior-conviction notice, SGI consequences, and any resolution proposed by the Crown. Pleading too early can mean accepting mandatory custody and years of driving restrictions without knowing whether the evidence can withstand a challenge.
Early preparation gives your lawyer time to obtain and review the complete disclosure before you enter a plea. Your lawyer can then explain the strength of the evidence, possible Charter issues, sentencing exposure, and Saskatchewan Government Insurance consequences.
You should understand those issues before pleading guilty or making another decision that could result in mandatory jail and years of driving restrictions.
Contact Alan Pearse About a 2nd Impairment Offence in Saskatchewan
The most important decision in a second impaired driving case may happen before trial: whether to challenge the charge, negotiate a resolution, or enter a plea. That decision should come after the disclosure, testing procedure, Charter issues, prior-conviction notice, and Saskatchewan penalties have been carefully reviewed.
Alan Pearse has practised since 2000 and has defended several thousand people charged with impaired driving offences. He regularly lectures lawyers and law students on impaired driving law, and he personally handles his trials rather than transferring them to another lawyer.
Contact us for a free consultation about a 2nd DUI offence. Alan can review the new charge, confirm how the prior conviction may affect sentencing, examine the police evidence and testing process, and explain the criminal and provincial penalties you may face.
About Alan Pearse
Alan Pearse is a Saskatchewan-based DUI lawyer with a practice focused exclusively on impaired driving litigation. Alan is the author of Guide to Breathalyzer Certificates in Canada published by Canada Law Book.
Practicing since 2000, he has defended thousands of clients and frequently lectures on DUI law to lawyers and students. A member of the Law Society of Saskatchewan, he represents clients across Canada, except in Quebec. Alan Pearse regularly answers DUI-related inquiries from both legal professionals and the public.

What They Are Saying
Alan did a very good job. I felt like the police were on trial.
Allan Pearce was amazing and made the whole process easy to understand and gave me peace of mind. His experience and knowledge assured me that I had nothing to worry about. I highly recommend him as I didn't even have to step a foot in the court room and he won my case with ease. If you end up in the same situation give this man a call because he gets results fast. Thank you Allan for everything, I am very grateful for how quickly you resolved this problem for me and how easy you were to talk to.
I’m a single mother, and was going through a very bad breakup. I made a terrible mistake by drinking and driving, and put my child at risk. However, this is not who I really am. I’m generally very against drunk driving. I know that what I did was wrong, but I’m basically a good person. Alan met with me very quickly, and got the ball rolling. He was straightforward and honest, and told me what my chances were. I eventually decided to fight the charges, because I just couldn’t have a criminal record. I was very impressed with his abilities in court, and I eventually won the trial. Thank you so much.
Alan was very professional and got the absolute best results!!! Would recommend him to anybody !!! Thank you Alan
Alan represented me for the last 20 months with various charges. He has had all of my charges and fines dropped. He was always diligent at responding to my calls and texts when I had questions or concerns. His experience in DUI law and winning track record speaks for itself. I highly recommend Alan to anyone facing these charges and all of the other charges/fines that come along with anyone’s case.
